2012年11月7日 星期三

Research on street


Background

My project started by wandering around the city I live, alone, and aimlessly. It is always fun to go around on your own because the “time and space” can be exclusively owned. I went out at night because the city in daytime is busy and tiring. I can feel and connect to the city easier in silence.

        During a few times of casual walking, I found some interesting observation on the street.

Observation#1

Observation#2

Observation#3

-----------------------------------------------------

Observation #1

The chairs can be divided into two types: flexible and fixed.
The flexible type is actually single chairs, and the fixed type is always a combination of tables and chairs.

Chair is a kind of tools that can be counted as communication. Questions about the way chairs designed, how they placed by people, and whom use what kind of chairs and so on, are actually talking affecting conversation and thus communication.

I think the fixed types are not really comfortable and fit the users, and that implies that, the way people behave and people’s social activities are actually shaped by the third party, that is the recreational bureau of government.

Observation #2

The second observation is a corner watching day and night by cctv.
Actually I am rather interested on the issue of public spacing. Conflicts of public space between citizens, merchants and government are always existed. It is related to the rights of ownership, and obviously it is about money as well. Capitalism is one of the typical characters of Hong Kong.

I think the cctv looking at the corner covered with a red carpet strongly reflect the capitalism in Hong Kong. The owner even does not mind to waste extra resources to supervise that tiny corner under their ownership.

Observation #3

There are always Do’s and Don’ts signs, thousands of narrows and directing signals everywhere in Hong Kong. I think it is a single way of communication that only exists between master and servant. The reason behind is clear that, it would be much easier to manage a place when people doing nothing. In this case, our right to use the space of the city is deprived, which makes our city life without fun.



Research
Situationist International are a group of French who discovered and discontent with the unfairness and boredom in their city. They later developed into a group social movement mainly criticize on urban construction. 1950年代, 法國圑體「情境主義國際」(Situationist International, 1957-1972) 提出「景觀社會」的概念, 認為我們置身在一個由符號構成的價值系統, 大眾處於癡迷、受控制、默從而全神貫注的觀看狀態,因而遮蔽了現實世界的壓迫與不平等關係. 情境主義國際將抵抗的戰場從生產轉移到消費, 從勞動轉移到休閒, 從工廠轉移到城市與日常生活, 用文化革命取代階級鬥爭. 他們企圖打破藝術與政治的藩籬, 將生活藝術化, 以奪回我們的日常生活. 他們也鼓勵群眾擁抱街頭、惡搞海報, 挑戰所有權的觀念,相信在日常生活中採取行動必能造成改變. 塗鴉在他們手中被改造成一種政治武器, 用以挑戰正為景觀社會所控制的城市。」(陳琦, 2010) It is actually highly related to social and class struggles, culture, capitalism, materialism, and so on.

James Rosenquist(1964) ‘s view towards the society at that time is also perfectly suitable to describe the way most people live in Hong Kong “The media constantly reminds us that we lived in a material utopia. We had electric can openers, dishwashers, two-tone cars, television sets- there was all this stuff. The idea being promoted was that everybody should be peppy and happy and could have everything they wanted: two and a half cars, three and a half children and instant everything. People clung to the idea of their own personal utopia, which had been fused in the American imagination onto commercial products. Every ad in every magazine and TV commercial was telling you that you could buy happiness on the installment plan.”

One of their famous movement/activity is Detournement, frankly speaking, is to do something without plans inside an already planned city. It is a resistance to control.

I have tried something similar in daytime. This time is Mongkok. I started my journal without any expectation. Afterwards, I think such activity can be fun without anxious. Since you are wandering without any expectation, you won’t feel nervous or eager to look for something. Instead, you can really enjoy and discover fun things as you throw away expectations and plans in your mind.

Also, people and the environment are connected to each together. When you walk along streets, you can experience the streets and paths, and interacting with other people. Roads are not served as the path between home and workplace anymore. Rather, we can entertain with streets and buildings, that is, any space in Hong Kong

What am I going to do: to (1) make fun with the environment in Hong Kong. I want to make use of the environment rather than concentrate on particular or a few types of material and media. (2) Not self-entertaining or self-fulfillment. I want to make something interactive with other people, not a single way of transmitting my message to the audience. (3) Flexible and able to move around, so that people can enjoy the fun together and anywhere.


Research:
I am really fond of the arts in 1960s. They are lively, strong and intense in visual.
It is very energetic with bold lines and with lots of colours.



Bibliography
A users guide, the Situationist international, Simon ford, 2005, p. 25,33
Psychedelic Consciousness transformed modern art, Ken Johnson, 2011, 44
塗鴉鬼飛踢, 畢恆達, 2011 遠流出版事業股份有限公司
畫在牆上的聲音:塗鴉文化史 陳琦 2010 山東美術出版社


**********************************************
Reflection from supervisor:

除硬性禁止, 也有軟性管制,如在硬件上做手腳令到FUNCTION有限制。
可以相反方向想,簡單來說,走{喇},找尋例子用家如何拆招

功課: 找5至6個例子
也要自己想想如何令成件事好玩WITHOUT TOO MUCH 條件

2012年10月31日 星期三

book reference

'how psychedelic consciousness transformed modern art' written by  ken johnson,
he introduced plenty of fantastic works and interviews/ quotations of artists.

Material utopia and Personal utopia by James Rosenquist


http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2012/01/James-Rosenquist-post/_jcr_content/par/cn_contentwell/par-main/cn_blogpost/cn_slideshow/item3.rendition.slideshowHorizontal.james-rosenquist-ss04.jpg
James Rosenquist’s F-111

2012年10月29日 星期一

Situationist International, art

Remix the book
http://www.remixthebook.com/
http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2007/10/
http://www.remixthebook.com/the-course/detournement-2

the planned city

MUST READ

Situationist International Anthology
Revised and Expanded Edition, 2006. 532 pages.

http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/index.htm

so cool

"We are bored in the city"

Our city has been constructed and DESIGNED intentionally, which directly affects users' daily activities.

Situationist International
wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situationist_International

A call for the creation of a new situationist international.

Enragés and Situationists in the Occupations Movement

What do/did they do

Story behind (culture/ideology/social/political)





US- PPSproject for public space--- Creating public space

placemaking
http://www.pps.org/

2012年10月23日 星期二

夜遊灣仔





上星期某個夜晚到灣仔走了一遍
看看那裡的休憩設施── 原本想看喜帖街。
雖然不知有沒有走對了路,但灣仔那邊出現很多地盤,也有作勢伸往更高的建築物。



左邊兩幅是被CCTV守護的一個角落 (連一小塊地也不放過。)





這是港灣道休憩公園的標示。
第一眼看過去,是驚奇的,之後就想究竟有甚麼是可以做的。
場內看見一群人在耍太極,假使有一天大家的太極功力很強,都可以使出氣功,那時候這養生的活動也要被禁嗎?

很多「私人地方」都圍上了禁標,或是刺眼的橙色雪糕筒(太古坊,會補相)

24/10/2012



從FB抓回來的,是出自石家豪先生的手筆
總算進一步釐清我對藝術的CONFUSION
現在我要做的,(暫時)應該偏向左上。

有關公共空間的問題,
我要循幾方面探討
之前我執著於公共空間的規劃問題,
這固然是個最基本的問題源頭,
但我應更著重使用者跟它的閞係

下一步我要做的
就去再看看不同公共空間的情況
1 全日都看同一地點
2 早/午/晚 各看幾個公共空間

至於選取哪一/哪些空間
我倒要仔細想
>公園?吸煙區?那被CCTV盯著的小角?
>甚麼是公共空間?﹣﹣﹣ 家裡也可歸類為公共空間!

**CCTV 是有趣的TOPIC
我們生活在這城裡,責任和權利是甚麼?
是不是要受人規限、跟著指示去做所有事情?

2012年10月2日 星期二

Proposals

30/9/2012
[Honours Project Proposal]

Hong Kong is a small city, and is famous for the beautiful night view—thanks to the intensity of buildings and never-switch-off neon lights. There are more and more buildings within our tiny city: shopping malls, and residential buildings. These buildings undoubtedly bring new entertainments and space for us citizens to use. However, when looking back to the disappearing old community area, the amount of public spaces seems decreasing silently. Graffiti are removed; street sleepers have no place to stay, street dancers were expulsed. Most Hong Kong people live peacefully in a well planned area, yet we seem have no rights and responsibility to our own city. I wonder who owns this city: us citizen, the government or merchants? I would like to investigate more about public space, citizens’ right of using public space.


3/10/2012
[Honours Project 1st meeting with supervisor]

To give further explain to my last proposal, there are 3 main points I would like to highlight (refer to my last proposal): Disappearing Old Community and public space; Types of New constructions- space and effect to our culture; and our Rights and responsibility to Hong Kong.



The disappearing old buildings and streets are marking the fading of the old generation and old living style. The change of recreational area(both in style and location) would make changes to some local cultural activities. For instance, Lower ngau tou kok estate and Wan Chai market. The living style and people's living environment changes because of urban renewal.  [wt's Hong Kong culture]

Second, the government is now undertaking the urban renewal project in different districts with old buildings, and would like to transform them into some modern-like districts. As a citizen, such large-scale construction bring more inconvenience to citizens rather than benefits. It is not a human-based project for citizens within this decade. [The final benefit would go to who's pocket? citizens/ merchants]

Rights and responsibilities of citizens can actually be reflected everywhere in Hong Kong.
For example, the un-used areas under highways and parks are used to be open to public use, yet under the 'management' of merchants/government, citizens' freedom were being deprived.